1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 222 F.Supp.
  5. 222 F.Supp. 175 (1963)
 

U. S. v. MONACO AND SON, INC.

Civ. A. No. 12996.

222 F.Supp. 175 (1963)

UNITED STATES of America, for the Use and Benefit of GULFPORT PIPING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. MONACO AND SON, INC., Durant Insulated Pipe Company, Inc. and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Defendants.

United States District Court D. Maryland.

September 24, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Carleton Sharretts, Jr., Baltimore, Md., Dan H. Shell, Kenneth G. Perry, Satterfield, Shell, Williams & Buford, Jackson, Miss., for plaintiff Gulfport.

Kahl K. Spriggs, Chevy Chase, Md., for defendant Monaco.

John E. Smeltz, Cleveland, Ohio, for Durant.

Charles C. Hartman, Jr., Annapolis, Md., for Hartford.

WINTER, District Judge:

In this suit, brought under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270a et seq., Gulfport Piping Company (hereafter called "Gulfport") is the use plaintiff. Named as defendants are Monaco and Son, Inc. (hereafter called "Monaco"), Durant Insulated Pipe Company, Inc. (hereafter called "Durant"), and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (hereafter called "Hartford"), the corporate surety on the Miller Act bond provided by Monaco after the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases