1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 39 N.J.
  5. 39 N.J. 355 (1963)
 

ESSO STANDARD OIL CO. v. HOLDERMAN

39 N.J. 355 (1963)

188 A.2d 599

ESSO STANDARD OIL COMPANY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. CARL HOLDERMAN, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. CARL HOLDERMAN, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. RAYMOND F. MALE, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 4, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John W. Fritz and Mr. Edward B. Meredith argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Wharton, Stewart & Davis, attorneys).

Mr. Theodore I. Botter argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases