CLAY, Commissioner.
Appellant was convicted under KRS 405.030 of unreasonably neglecting to support his infant child when he was tried in absentia.
On this appeal he first contends he was entitled to a continuance. While the unusual circumstances would certainly have justified a continuance, we do not find the trial court abused its discretion.
Appellant further contends the Commonwealth failed to prove the commission of this crime. The facts are as...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
