PIERCE v. KING COUNTY

Nos. 36345, 36496.

62 Wn.2d 324 (1963)

382 P.2d 628

JAMES W. PIERCE et al., Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, Respondent, EASTGATE IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, Intervenor-Appellant. EASTGATE IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, Appellant, v. KING COUNTY, Respondent. EASTGATE IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, Appellant, v. KING COUNTY, Respondent, JAMES W. PIERCE et al., Intervenor-Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

June 13, 1963.


HALE, J.

This is an appeal from judgments of the superior court in both certiorari and mandamus arising out of certain zoning resolutions in King County, Washington. The certiorari and mandamus proceedings were consolidated for the trial and this appeal.

Appellant, Eastgate Improvement Company, was part owner of and directly connected with the development of some two thousand acres of agricultural land east of Lake...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases