Per Curiam.
Petitioner's primary contention is that his arrest was illegal and void and thus his conviction was void.
However, even if the arrest were illegal it would not affect the petitioner's subsequent conviction under a plea of guilty. There is no question of illegally obtained evidence raised in the present case. The validity of an accused's conviction is dependent upon a valid indictment and trial thereon, and illegality in relation to his arrest...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
