CAMPO v. PAAR


18 A.D.2d 364 (1963)

Pupi Campo, Respondent, v. Jack Paar, Appellant, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 23, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward Labaton of counsel (Sidney Kramer and Alan E. Bandler with him on the brief; Sidney Kramer, attorney), for appellant.

Bernard Buchwald of counsel (Harry Pimstein and Paul Lewin with him on the brief; Buchwald, Nadel, Cohen & Hoffman and Harry Pimstein, attorneys), for respondent.

RABIN, J. P., McNALLY, STEVENS and EAGER, JJ., concur.


STEUER, J.

Plaintiff has recovered a verdict in an action for slander. The verdict as rendered by the jury was so contradictory in its terms that it is apparent that the jury had no clear appreciation of the issues involved. In outline, the facts are: Plaintiff had for a considerable period been a performer on defendant's television shows. Defendant gave him notice that the employment was about to be terminated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases