1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 19 Wis.2d
  5. 19 Wis.2d 360 (1963)
 

BARRETT v. PEPOON

19 Wis.2d 360 (1963)

BARRETT, Respondent, v. PEPOON, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 5, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Glassner, Clancy & Glassner of Milwaukee, and oral argument by William E. Glassner, Jr., and Lawrence Clancy.

For the respondent there was a brief by Robertson, Hoebreckx & Davis, attorneys, and John G. Vergeront of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Vergeront.

GORDON, J.

The complaint alleges the existence of a void judgment in favor of Mr. Pepoon. Paragraph three of the complaint recites the basis upon which the plaintiff Barrett contends that the judgment in favor of Pepoon is void.

Our scrutiny of the complaint convinces us that a cause of action is not alleged. In paragraph 3 of the complaint the plaintiff avers that the judgment was entered against arrett "without authority of law." This is a conclusion of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases