LEE v. MILWAUKEE GAS LIGHT CO.


20 Wis.2d 333 (1963)

LEE, Respondent, v. MILWAUKEE GAS LIGHT COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 28, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Sonnenberg & Boden of Milwaukee, and oral argument by H. F. Sonnenberg.

For the respondent there was a brief by Eisenberg & Kletzke, attorneys, and Edwin A. Star of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Sydney M. Eisenberg.


HALLOWS, J.

The defendant argues the court erred in not granting an involuntary nonsuit against the plaintiff, in not directing a verdict, and in not changing the answers of the verdict and dismissing the complaint. All three assignments rest on the same proposition that there was no direct evidence of negligence or causation and the jury could only speculate.

Basically, the defendant's position challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. The motion for involuntary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases