1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 226 F.Supp.
  5. 226 F.Supp. 120 (1963)
 

MAX FACTOR & CO. v. FACTOR

No. 62-1660.

226 F.Supp. 120 (1963)

MAX FACTOR & CO., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. Max FACTOR, individually and doing business as Max Factor Hosiery of Beverly Hills, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division.

September 17, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, by John L. Endicott, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

Jerome Weber and Bernard Mattison, Beverly Hills, Cal., for defendant.

CRARY, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks judgment permanently enjoining defendant from use of the name "Max Factor" or any colorable imitation of plaintiff's trademarks "Max Factor" and "Max Factor of Hollywood" as a brand name or trademark for hosiery, or any product similar or related to the products of plaintiff, and for damages for trademark infringement and for unfair competition. Section 1114, Title 15 United States Code, concerns trademark infringement and provides...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases