1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 219 F.Supp.
  5. 219 F.Supp. 126 (1963)
 

WESTERN MARYLAND RAILWAY CO. v. CONTINENTAL GRAIN CO.

219 F.Supp. 126 (1963)

WESTERN MARYLAND RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. CONTINENTAL GRAIN COMPANY et al., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

June 26, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City, for plaintiff.

Weidenbaum, Bank & Teicher, New York City, for defendants Sinason Teicher and Inter. Am. Grain.

Graubard & Moskovitz, New York City, for defendant Bunge.

Buchter, Ratheim, Abrams & Hoffman, New York City, for Leval & Garnac.

Charles A. Gutwirth, New York City, for Continental Grain.

EDELSTEIN, District Judge.

This action was commenced by the plaintiff, Western Maryland Railway Co., against eleven defendants to collect storage and detention charges allegedly due and owing. Defendant Bunge Corporation, named as defendant in the third count of the complaint, now moves for summary judgment under Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. Counsel have agreed that there is no genuine issue of material fact. And indeed after...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases