1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 21 Wis.2d
  5. 21 Wis.2d 323 (1963)
 

PETOSKEY v. SCHMIDT

21 Wis.2d 323 (1963)

PETOSKEY and another, Appellants, v. SCHMIDT and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 29, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Schneiderman & Strnad of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Burton A. Strnad.

For the respondents there was a brief by Thomas J. Regan, Robert F. Larkin, and Robert A. Hess, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Regan.

GORDON, J.

Numerous technical deficiencies in the proceedings are asserted by the plaintiffs as a basis for a new trial. We will consider them seriatim.

I. Use of the Conjunctive in the Verdict.

The first question of the special verdict inquired as to the negligence of "the defendants Robert Schmidt and State Fair Park, Inc." The plaintiffs contend that the question should have contained the expression...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases