1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 217 F.Supp.
  5. 217 F.Supp. 110 (1963)
 

UNITED STATES v. PENN-OLIN CHEMICAL COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 2282.

217 F.Supp. 110 (1963)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. PENN-OLIN CHEMICAL COMPANY, Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation and Pennsalt Chemicals Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court D. Delaware.

May 1, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alexander Greenfeld and Leonard G. Hagner, U. S. Attys., District of Delaware, Wilmington, Del., Daniel J. Freed and Edward A. Copley, Justice Dept., Antitrust Division, Washington, D. C., for United States.

William S. Potter (Berl, Potter & Anderson), Wilmington, Del., for defendants.

H. Francis DeLone and John T. Subak (Dechert, Price & Rhoads), Philadelphia, Pa., for Pennsalt Chemicals Corp.

Albert R. Connelly and John W. Barnum (Cravath, Swaine & Moore), New York City, for Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp.

STEEL, District Judge.

The Government has brought a civil action against Penn-Olin Chemical Company (Penn-Olin), Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation (Olin), and Pennsalt Chemicals Corporation (Pennsalt), in which it seeks to prevent and restrain them from allegedly continuing to violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases