FONTENOT v. NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY

No. 732.

149 So.2d 176 (1963)

Euzebe FONTENOT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

January 28, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rogers & McHale, by Jack Rogers and Robert McHale, Lake Charles, for plaintiff-appellant.

Hall, Raggio & Farrar, by R. W. Farrar, Jr., Lake Charles, for defendant-appellee.

Before FRUGE, SAVOY and CULPEPPER, JJ.


FRUGE, Judge.

This is a suit for workmen's compensation by Euzebe Fontenot against his employer's insurer. From a judgment in favor of the defendant insurer, dismissing plaintiff's suit on the ground that he did not prove that he had been injured arising out of and in the course of his employment, plaintiff has appealed to this court.

Appellant alleged that on or about December 23, 1960, while painting the gymnasium floor at the W. O. Boston High School in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases