SHANNON, Chief Judge.
The appellant was convicted under two separate informations for obtaining property in return for worthless checks, and he has appealed both convictions. The cases were consolidated for trial in the lower court, and we have consolidated them for appeal, the question involved herein being common to both cases.
In the course of the trial the State had the burden of proof of identification of the signature of the defendant, and for this purpose...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.