STATE BY FURMAN v. ELIZABETHTOWN WATER CO.


40 N.J. 280 (1963)

191 A.2d 457

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY DAVID D. FURMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. ELIZABETHTOWN WATER COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION (SUCCESSOR BY CONSOLIDATION TO PLAINFIELD-UNION WATER COMPANY AND ELIZABETHTOWN WATER COMPANY CONSOLIDATED), DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 3, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William M. Feinberg argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant and cross-respondent (Mr. Charles J. Kehoe and Mr. H. Douglas Stine, of counsel; Mr. William M. Feinberg and Mr. Alan Goldstein, on the brief).

Mr. John R. Sailer argued the cause for defendant-respondent and cross-appellant.


The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, J.

The Appellate Division, in a full opinion by Judge Kilkenny, rejected the plaintiff's appeal and the defendant's cross-appeal from judgments entered in the Chancery Division. State v. Plainfield-Union Water Co., 75 N.J.Super. 571 (1962). We granted certification on petitions by the parties. 38 N.J. 498 (1962).

The State instituted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases