Per Curiam.
Petitioner in the instant case raises no jurisdictional questions. He attacks neither the validity of his indictments nor the jurisdiction of the trial court. He does not argue that he was deprived of any his constitutional rights.
Petitioner's sole contention is based on the fact that his sentence for escape was made to run concurrently with his sentences on the other charges against him. He argues that, inasmuch as Section 2901.11, Revised...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.