1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 19 Wis.2d
  5. 19 Wis.2d 298 (1963)
 

CONWELL v. MILWAUKEE AUTOMOBILE MUT. INS. CO.

19 Wis.2d 298 (1963)

CONWELL, Appellant, v. MILWAUKEE AUTOMOBILE MUTUAL, INSURANCE COMPANY and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 5, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Maurice Schmerling of Kenosha, and N. Paley Phillips of Milwaukee.

For the respondents there was a brief by Vaudreuil & Vaudreuil of Kenosha, and oral argument by Leo E. Vaudreuil.

DIETERICH, J.

One of the issues raised on this appeal is whether cross-examination of plaintiff by counsel for defendants was prejudicial in spite of the trial court's efforts to erase any prejudicial effects of that cross-examination from the minds of the jurors.

The portion of the cross-examination of plaintiff by counsel for defendants which is relevant to this issue is as follows:

"Q. On the 9th day of May, 1960, were you involved is a fight...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases