1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 235 Or.
  5. 235 Or. 75 (1963)
 

STATE v. LaSPINA

235 Or. 75 (1963)

383 P.2d 775

STATE OF OREGON v. LaSPINA

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed July 15, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William G. Paulus, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Paulus & Callaghan, Salem.

Gary D. Gortmaker, Deputy District Attorney for Marion County, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief was Hattie Bratzel Kremen, District Attorney for Marion County.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of armed robbery and appeals. He assigns as error (1) lack of proper identification of two guns admitted in evidence, and (2) that the sentence of 15 years constitutes cruel and inhuman punishment.

We have carefully reviewed the record. The assignments of error are without merit.

The judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases