ORTEGA v. THOMAS

No. 9709.

14 Utah 2d 296 (1963)

383 P.2d 406

DELFIN E. ORTEGA, PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT, v. PERRY ARTHUR THOMAS, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Utah.

June 28, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hanson & Baldwin, Merlin R. Lybbert, Salt Lake City, for appellant.

K. Samuel King, Salt Lake City, for respondent.


McDONOUGH, Justice.

Plaintiff obtained a jury verdict for damages to his automobile and personal injury to himself which resulted from an automobile collision. Defendant appeals.

In setting forth the basis for appeal defendant's counsel have recited the facts according to their own view of the evidence. The rule is so fundamental that the facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to the party who prevailed below,1 that it...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases