1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 40 N.J.
  5. 40 N.J. 269 (1963)
 

CAPALDO v. REIMER

40 N.J. 269 (1963)

191 A.2d 298

EDMUND CAPALDO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NORMA REIMER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. ALBERT F. GERMAINE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NORMA REIMER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND EDMUND CAPALDO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 3, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Jerome S. Lieb argued the cause for defendant-appellant Norma Reimer (Messrs. Harkavy & Lieb, attorneys; Mr. Ronald M. Sturtz, on the brief).

Mr. Robert N. Wilentz argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent, Edmund Capaldo (Messrs. Weiner, Weiner & Glennon, attorneys; Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, of counsel; Mr. Robert N. Wilentz, on the brief).

No appearance was made on behalf of plaintiff-respondent Albert F. Germaine.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PROCTOR, J.

This is a negligence case arising out of a collision between an automobile operated by the defendant Norma Reimer and a panel truck operated by the plaintiff Edmund Capaldo in which the plaintiff Albert Germaine was a passenger. Germaine filed a complaint to recover for his personal injuries against Capaldo, Mrs. Reimer and her husband Howard, owner of the automobile. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases