1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 133 S.E.2d
  5. 133 S.E.2d 173 (1963)
 

SPRUEILL v. HAMLET

No. 392.

133 S.E.2d 173 (1963)

260 N.C. 546

Mrs. Bertha SPRUEILL Administratrix of the Estate of Maurice Sprueill, Jr. v. Linard HAMLET.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 20, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burns, Long & Burns, by F. Kent Burns, Roxboro, Young, Moore & Henderson, by J. C. Moore, Raleigh, for plaintiff appellant.

Haywood & Denny, by Egbert L. Haywood and George W. Miller, Jr., Durham, for defendant appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully examined the evidence. We are of the opinion and hold that, when viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, it is sufficient to permit a jury to find the facts to be as alleged by plaintiff. If the facts be as plaintiff alleges, defendant is liable. No useful purpose would be served by detailed analysis of the evidence. In accord with our practice, Weaver v. Bennett, 259 N.C. 16,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases