CARRADINE v. CITY OF NEW YORK


13 N.Y.2d 291 (1963)

Charles Carradine, an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, Daniel Carradine, et al., Respondents, v. City of New York, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Thomas Santiago, as Administrator of The Estate of Robert Santiago, Deceased, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.)

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided December 30, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo A. Larkin, Corporation Counsel (John A. Murray and Seymour B. Quel of counsel), for appellant.

Herman J. McCarthy and Edward S. Marshall for Charles Carradine and another, respondents.

Frederick J. Ludwig and Bernard Pizzitola for Thomas Santiago, respondent.

Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, FOSTER and SCILEPPI concur.


Per Curiam.

We agree with the Appellate Division that the proper standard of care owed to trespassers by a property owner, in refraining from willful, wanton or intentional acts or their equivalents, is to be determined from the pertinent facts and relevant circumstances of each case. We feel, however, that a new trial should be ordered in this case, since the trial court erroneously charged the jury, with exception...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases