FANNIN v. ROE

No. 36046.

62 Wn.2d 239 (1963)

382 P.2d 264

WILLIAM FANNIN et al., Appellants, v. LEO M. ROE, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

May 29, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maslan, Maslan & Hanan and Bernard D. Greene, for appellants.

Montgomery, Montgomery & Purdue, for respondent.


HAMILTON, J.

This is a personal injury action arising out of an automobile accident. Trial was commenced before a jury. At the conclusion of plaintiffs' evidence, the trial court sustained defendant's challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence and dismissed plaintiffs' action. Plaintiffs' appeal, assigning error to the trial court's ruling.

A review of the record reveals the following version of the accident presented by plaintiffs' evidence: On August 14...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases