1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 217 F.Supp.
  5. 217 F.Supp. 84 (1963)
 

PAUL v. SINNOTT

Civ. A. No. 62-754.

217 F.Supp. 84 (1963)

Theodore R. PAUL and Pittsburgh Electrical Insulation Co., Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Edward J. SINNOTT and Reinforced Moulding Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

March 7, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George Raynovich, Jr., of Stone & Silvestri, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Henry E. Rea, Jr., of Brandt, Riester, Brandt & Malone, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendants.

MARSH, District Judge.

In this action plaintiffs allege infringement of their patented method of producing fibrous tape. At this stage of the proceedings we are called upon to adjudicate plaintiffs' "Motion for Inspection and Photographing", pursuant to Rule 34, Fed.R.Civ.P. In their motion plaintiffs request an order requiring defendants to:

"1. Permit plaintiff, THEODORE R. PAUL, his attorneys, and experts retained by him or plaintiff, PITTSBURGH ELECTRICAL...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases