1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 80 N.J.
  5. 80 N.J. Super. 203 (1963)
 

LAMENA v. CAMDEN LOCAL NO. 396, ETC.

80 N.J. Super. 203 (1963)

193 A.2d 285

JAMES LAMENA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CAMDEN LOCAL NO. 396 OF THE JOURNEYMEN BARBERS, HAIRDRESSERS, COSMETOLOGISTS AND PROPRIETORS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 8, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Albert K. Plone argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Plone, Tomar, Parks & Seliger, attorneys; Mr. Howard S. Simonoff, on the brief).

Mr. Lee B. Laskin argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges CONFORD, GAULKIN and KILKENNY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, S.J.A.D.

The Chancery Division enjoined the defendant union from picketing plaintiff's barbershop in Haddonfield for purposes of causing or coercing him to join the union or coercing his nonunion employees into doing so. The union (hereinafter referred to as the barbers' local) appeals.

The facts shown by the record are these. Plaintiff operates a small barbershop...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases