1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 79 N.J.
  5. 79 N.J. Super. 194 (1963)
 

DIETZ v. MEYER

79 N.J. Super. 194 (1963)

191 A.2d 182

DANIEL V. DIETZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ROBERT MEYER AND CONSTANCE MEYER, DEFENDANTS, AND NED J. PARSEKIAN, DIRECTOR OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 16, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Sam Weiss argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Brass & Brass, attorneys; Mr. Weiss, of counsel).

Mr. Jos. P. Dallanegra, Jr. argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Jos. P. Dallanegra, attorney).

Before Judges CONFORD, GAULKIN and KILKENNY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, S.J.A.D.

The question here is whether the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Law, N.J.S.A. 39:6-61 et seq., and particularly section 39:6-78, permits one injured while a passenger in a car involved in an accident to join the Director of Motor Vehicles as a defendant, along with the operator of the car he was riding in, when he asserts that the accident was caused by the negligence both of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases