1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 235 Or.
  5. 235 Or. 38 (1963)
 

HOOD v. HATFIELD

235 Or. 38 (1963)

383 P.2d 1021

IN RE ESTATE OF HATFIELD HOOD v. HATFIELD ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed July 15, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W.R. Bradshaw, Klamath Falls, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

David Card, Klamath Falls, argued the cause for respondent Andrew Hi Hatfield. On the brief were Smith and Card.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

LUSK, J.

This is a proceeding for determination of heirship and right of distribution of the estate of Ronald Joseph Hatfield, deceased. The petitioner, Alice O. Hood, the natural mother of the deceased, claims to be his sole heir at law. The defendant, Andrew Hi Hatfield, the adoptive father of the deceased, claims to be entitled to an equal distributive share of the estate with the petitioner. The court entered a decree in accordance with Hatfield...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases