MEDAK v. DePREZ


236 Or. 31 (1963)

386 P.2d 805

MEDAK ET AL v. DePREZ ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed November 13, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. Dwyer Wilson, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Wilson & Crew, Portland.

John P. Ronchetto, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Fewless & Douglass, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, SLOAN, GOODWIN and LUSK, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

GOODWIN, J.

The plaintiffs, payees and holders of a demand promissory note, recovered judgment against the makers of the note. The makers appeal.

The note was given as earnest money, subject to forfeiture, in connection with an offer to purchase certain real estate. The offer was accepted by the sellers, but the transaction was never consummated. The payees of the note were the real estate brokers who had been employed to sell certain property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases