1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 219 F.Supp.
  5. 219 F.Supp. 43 (1963)
 

HUDSON TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. UNITED STATES

Civ. A. Nos. 362-62, 306-62.

219 F.Supp. 43 (1963)

HUDSON TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. The UNITED STATES of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Defendants. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Intervening Defendant. ARROW CARRIER CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. The UNITED STATES of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Defendants. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Intervening Defendant.

United States District Court D. New Jersey.

June 14, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

August W. Heckman, Jersey City, N. J., for plaintiff Hudson Transp. Co.

Evans, Hand, Evans, Allabough & Amoresano, Paterson, N. J., for plaintiff Arrow Carrier Corp.

David M. Satz, Jr., U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J., Lee Loevinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., and John H. D. Wigger, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant, United States.

Robert W. Ginnane, Gen. Counsel, and H. Neil Garson, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Interstate Commerce Commission, Washington, D. C., for defendant, Interstate Commerce Commission.

William A. Goichman, Asst. Counsel, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg, Pa., for intervening defendant Pennsylvania Public Utility Comm.

John R. Sailer, Elizabeth, N. J., for intervening defendants Highway Express Lines, Inc., Rodgers Motor Lines, Inc., Fowler & Williams, Inc., and Modern Transfer Co.

Lum Biunno & Tompkins, Newark, N. J., for intervening defendant Pennsylvania R. Co.

Before McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge, and WORTENDYKE and LANE, District Judges.

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.

These are separate suits by unrelated parties brought under 28 U.S.C. § 1336 to set aside orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission. Because they involved similar issues the proceedings before the Interstate Commerce Commission were heard on a consolidated record, with the Examiner filing a single report and recommended order regarding them. They were reconsidered by Division One of the Interstate Commerce Commission which filed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases