1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 21 Wis.2d
  5. 21 Wis.2d 224 (1963)
 

STATE v. MARGOLES

21 Wis.2d 224 (1963)

STATE, Respondent, v. MARGOLES, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 29, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Roland J. Steinle, Sr., and Roland J. Steinle, Jr., both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Roland J. Steinle, Sr.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Warren H. Resh, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were George Thompson, attorney general, William J. McCauley, district attorney of Milwaukee county, and High R. O'Connell, first assistant district attorney.

FAIRCHILD, J.

Defendant's brief makes it clear that he is not claiming error committed by the circuit court, nor a lack of legal foundation for the judgment. He asks us to use our discretionary power of reversal or modification under sec. 251.09, Stats.

Defendant advances three propositions, which we shall discuss in order:

(1) defendant argues that the procedure followed in seeking to suspend or revoke defendant's license to practice medicine was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases