1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 19 Wis.2d
  5. 19 Wis.2d 224 (1963)
 

WOJCIUK v. UNITED STATES RUBBER CO.

19 Wis.2d 224 (1963)

WOJCIUK and wife, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. UNITED STATES RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent: STUEWER, Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 5, 1963.

August 6, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Foley, Sammond & Lardner and John R. Collins, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Collins.

For the respondents there was a brief by Arnold, Murray & O'Neill of Milwaukee, for Herbert Stuewer, and by Wickham, Borgelt, Skogstad & Powell of Milwaukee, for the United States Rubber Company and the Phillips Petroleum Company, and oral argument by Kurt H. Frown and James T. Murray, both of Milwaukee.

FAIRCHILD, J.

Two issues are presented on this appeal: (1) Did the trial court abuse its discretion in not allowing the plaintiffs' witness, Dr. Alfred Schmidt, to testify as an expert? (2) Did the trial court err in directing verdict in favor of the respective defendants?

1. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in not allowing the plaintiffs' witness, Dr. Alfred Schmidt, to testify as an expert?

"The question of whether a witness possesses...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases