FISHER ET AL., v. BOWERS

Nos. 37911, 37912, 37913, 37914, 37915, 37916 and 37917.

175 Ohio St. 68 (1963)

FISHER ET AL., APPELLEES, v. BOWERS, TAX COMMR., APPELLANT. HASWELL, APPELLEE, v. BOWERS, TAX COMMR., APPELLANT. (Two cases.) BURTANGER ET AL., APPELLEES, v. BOWERS, TAX COMMR., APPELLANT. FINN ET AL., APPELLEES, v. BOWERS, TAX COMMR., APPELLANT. (Two cases) FINN, APPELLEE, v. BOWERS, TAX COMMR. APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 19, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Estabrook, Finn & McKee, for appellees.

Mr. William B. Saxbe, attorney general, and Mr. John J. Lokos, for appellant.


TAFT, C. J.

The Tax Commissioner contends that the enactment of Section 5711.22, Revised Code, at the time of the repeal of Section 5711.20, Revised Code, resulted in requiring a taxpayer to list as unproductive investments all those income-yielding investments owned on tax listing day which had not been outstanding for the full calendar year preceding that day.

Unquestionably this would be required of a taxpayer who had not, pursuant to Section 5711.10, Revised...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases