1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.2d
  4. 60 Cal.2d
  5. 60 Cal.2d 177 (1963)
 

ARONOFF v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD

Docket No. Sac. 7440.

60 Cal.2d 177 (1963)

383 P.2d 409

32 Cal. Rptr. 1

STUART ARONOFF et al., Petitioners, v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

July 18, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

LeSage & Bowman and Thomas W. LeSage for Petitioners.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General, Dan Kaufmann, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondents.

McCOMB, J.

Petitioners seek a writ of prohibition restraining respondents from taking any further steps to collect taxes assessed against them.

Facts: The taxes in question relate to assessments by the Franchise Tax Board of additional personal income taxes based on the disallowance of deductions claimed by petitioners on their California personal income tax returns. The disallowance of the deductions was based on former section 17359 of the Revenue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases