MENDEL v. PINKARD

40006, 40008.

108 Ga. App. 128 (1963)

132 S.E.2d 217

MENDEL et al. v. PINKARD et al.; and vice versa.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Rehearing Denied July 2, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Westmoreland, Hall & Pentecost, John L. Westmoreland, for plaintiffs in error.

Troutman, Sams, Schroder & Lockerman, Allen E. Lockerman, Robert L. Pennington, contra.


BELL, Judge.

1. The controversies presented in this appeal, stemming as they do from a contract creating a long-term lease of realty, necessitate that we first examine the agreement for ambiguity. If unambiguous, the construction of the contract, under authority of numerous decisions of our appellate courts and Code § 20-701, is a question of law which the courts have a duty to perform. On the topic of ambiguity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases