1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 18 A.D.2d
  5. 18 A.D.2d 5 (1963)
 

CINEFOT INT. CORP. v. HUDSON PHOTO IND.

18 A.D.2d 5 (1963)

Cinefot International Corp., Respondent, v. Hudson Photographic Industries, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 21, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wm. Peyton Marin for appellant.

Emanuel Eschwege for respondent.

RABIN, J. P., McNALLY and STEUER, JJ., concur in Per Curiam opinion; EAGER, J., dissents in part in opinion in which VALENTE, J., concurs.

Per Curiam.

The corporate defendant moved at Special Term for judgment on the pleadings. It appears that the plaintiff and the appellant entered into an oral contract in October, 1957, the contract to run for a period of one year beginning January 1, 1958. The contract was fully performed on both sides and the parties continued their relationship through 1959 and into 1960. By the terms of the agreement plaintiff handled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases