RALSTON PURINA CO. v. TOYCEN MOTORS


21 Wis.2d 206 (1963)

RALSTON PURINA COMPANY, Respondent, v. TOYCEN MOTORS and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 29, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief and oral argument by Robert W. Dernbach of Eau Claire.

For the respondent there was a brief by Ramsdell, King, Carroll & Barland of Eau Claire, and oral argument by George Y. King.


BROWN, C. J.

The issues presented by the appeal are:

(1) Whether substantial issues of fact exist requiring a trial.

(2) Whether respondent has a right to cross-examine witnesses as a basis for defeating the motion for summary judgment.

(1) Substantial Issues of Fact.

The basic question relating to the defense of the present action is whether Toycen Motors, or GMAC, its assignee,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases