1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 215 F.Supp.
  5. 215 F.Supp. 3 (1963)
 

AMP INCORPORATED v. BURNDY CORPORATION

Civ. A. No. 1967.

215 F.Supp. 3 (1963)

AMP INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. BURNDY CORPORATION, Artcraft Electric Supply Co., Defendants.

United States District Court D. Delaware.

March 4, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas S. Lodge, Connolly, Bove & Lodge, Wilmington, Del., William C. Conner, and Truman S. Safford, Curtis, Morris & Safford, New York City, for plaintiff.

Richard F. Corroon, Berl, Potter & Anderson, Wilmington, Del., Floyd H. Crews, Morris Relson, and William F. Dudine, Jr., Darby & Darby, Daniel Gersen, and George M. Szabad, Blum, Jolles, Haimoff, Szabad & Gersen, New York City, and Ernest Fanwick, Norwalk, Conn., for defendants.

LEAHY, Senior District Judge.

I. PRE-LITIGATION BACKGROUND

Plaintiff AMP, Incorporated, sued Burndy Corporation for infringement. Defendant's answer denies infringement, charges the patent in suit is invalid, and seeks a declaratory judgment that the patent is invalid and not infringed. The patent, No. Re. 23,688 (7/21/52), was granted as a re-issue of No. 2,410,321 (10/29/46) on application of William S. Watts filed December 14, 1943. He assigned to plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases