1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 20 Wis.2d
  5. 20 Wis.2d 1 (1963)
 

FEHRMAN v. SMIRL

20 Wis.2d 1 (1963)

FEHRMAN and wife, Appellants, v. SMIRL, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 30, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs and oral argument by Herbert L. Mount of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a brief by Moore & Moore of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Raymond J. Moore and Gary E. Moore.

CURRIE, J.

Plaintiffs Fehrman first contend that the trial court erred in not changing the answer to Question One of the verdict from "No" to "Yes," and in then not answering the unanswered causation question "Yes," so as to entitle plaintiffs to judgment on the special verdict for the damages found by the jury. Should they not prevail with respect to this contention, they then request a new trial because the trial court erred: (1) In its rulings on evidence, (2)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases