1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.H.
  4. 105 N.H.
  5. 105 N.H. 76 (1963)
 

PEERLESS INSURANCE CO. v. CLOUGH

No. 5106.

105 N.H. 76 (1963)

PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY v. HAROLD CLOUGH & a.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

Decided July 30, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wescott & Millham (Mr. Harold E. Wescott orally), for the plaintiff.

George P. Cofran and L. Wilder Quint (Mr. Quint orally), for the defendant Clough.

Normandin, Normandin, Cheney & O'Neil for the defendants Clem and Jacobs furnished no brief.

BLANDIN, J.

The over-all question here may be easily stated. It is the interpretation of an insurance policy which is for this court. Hogan v. Lebel, 95 N.H. 95, 97. However, between the Scylla of what the Trial Justice has termed the confusing, bewildering and misleading provisions of the policy, and the Charybdis of conflicting decisions, it is by no means easy to determine the answer. The specific issues are whether we should sustain the Court's rulings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases