LANGLOIS v. WISCONSIN NAT. LIFE INS. CO.


19 Wis.2d 151 (1963)

LANGLOIS, Respondent, v. WISCONSIN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 5, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Douglas, Omernik & Bitney of Spooner, and oral argument by Edward E. Omernik.

For the respondent there was a brief by Cameron, Cameron & Shervey, and oral argument by Robert O. Weisel, all of Rice Lake.


FAIRCHILD, J.

1. Defendant not entitled to new trial as a matter of right. Defendant's principal challenge is that Questions Nos. 2 and 3 of the special verdict did not correctly present the issues of fact with respect to the claim of fraud. It does not appear that defendant requested any form of special verdict. It made no objection to the form prepared by the court. It did not move for a new trial on the ground of impropriety in the form of verdict.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases