PER CURIAM.
Evidence was offered by the propounders and by the caveators. The issues were submitted under a full, clear and correct charge; and the verdict is in all respects supported by plenary evidence. Particular discussion of the questions presented by caveators' (four) assignments of error is deemed unnecessary. Suffice to say, caveators' assignments do not show prejudicial error and are overruled.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.