1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 80 N.J.
  5. 80 N.J. Super. 58 (1963)
 

MEO v. COMMERCIAL CAN CORP.

80 N.J. Super. 58 (1963)

192 A.2d 854

FELIX MEO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. COMMERCIAL CAN CORP., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 3, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Frank Fink argued the cause for appellant (Mr. James J. Carroll, attorney).

Mr. Herman M. Wilson argued the cause for respondent (Mr. David B. Geltzeiler, attorney; Mr. Wilson, on the brief).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and FOLEY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

This is an appeal from a County Court judgment affirming a Workmen's Compensation Division award in favor of petitioner Meo against his employer, Commercial Can Corporation. The County Court opinion appears in 76 N.J.Super. 484 (1962).

The company concedes that the facts are not in dispute and credibility therefore plays no part in the consideration of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases