SHEELY, P. J., July 13, 1963.
We agree with the learned master in this case that the testimony of the minister called as a witness by plaintiff should not have been received. The master accepted the testimony under the provisions of Rule 131 as though it had been objected to and then ruled that it was not admissible. However, we also agree that the testimony of plaintiff, standing alone, was sufficient to establish her case.
Plaintiff called as a witness a...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
