TENNESSEE GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent, et al., Intervenors.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued February 11, 1963.
Decided July 18, 1963.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Mr. Melvin Richter, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Harry S. Littman, Jack Werner, W. C. Braden, Jr., and Dale A. Wright, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for petitioner.
Miss Josephine H. Klein, Atty., Federal Power Commission, with whom Messrs. Richard A. Solomon, Gen. Counsel, and Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Sol., Federal Power Commission, were on the brief, for respondent.
Mr. James J. Flood, Jr., Houston, Tex., with whom Mr. Alfred C. DeCrane, Jr., Houston, Tex., was on the brief for intervenor, Texaco Inc.
Mr. William W. Ross, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. J. David Mann, Jr., and John E. Holtzinger, Jr., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for intervenor, The United Gas Improvement Co., argued for intervenors, Philadelphia Electric Co., The United Gas Improvement Co., and Long Island Lighting Co.
Mr. James H. Littlehales, Washington, D. C., was on the brief for intervenor, Gulf Oil Corp.
Messrs. Bernard A. Foster, Jr., and Sherman S. Poland, Washington, D. C., were on the brief for intervenor, Atlantic Refining Company.
Messrs. Robert E. May and Omar L. Crook, Washington, D. C., were on the brief for intervenor, Sun Oil Co.
Messrs. George D. Horning, Jr., Patrick G. Sullivan and Harry L. Albrecht, Washington, D. C., were on the brief for intervenor, Union Oil Co. of California.
Messrs. David K. Kadane and Bertram D. Moll, Mineola, N. Y., were on the brief for intervenor, Long Island Lighting Co. Mr. Frederick Moring, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for intervenors, Long Island Lighting Co., Philadelphia Electric Co., and The United Gas Improvement Co.
Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and FAHY and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
BAZELON, Chief Judge.
This case is related to the Pan American Petroleum cases,1 decided today. There we upheld the Commission's sua sponte action in (1) reopening its order of May 29, 1961 which required gas producers to refund to their pipeline purchasers only such amounts, of the moneys collected as costs of an invalid Louisiana State tax, as the producers claimed and received in refunds from the State, and (2) entering a corrected...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.