SEC. LEASING CO. v. FOREMOST FOUNTAINS


41 Misc.2d 84 (1963)

Security Leasing Company et al., Appellants, v. Foremost Fountains, Inc., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

October 3, 1963


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Youran for appellants. Sylvia Weber for respondent.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J. P., GOLD and TILZER, JJ.


Per Curiam.

Even if privity was required to entitle the plaintiff The House of Imperial Chemists, Inc. (Imperial) to recover, there were triable issues whether Imperial had not contracted with the defendant before the plaintiff Security Leasing Company (Security) gave the defendant the purchase order of December 30, 1960 and, if so, whether the purchase order so given constituted a novation. Imperial's relation to the transaction

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases