://www.leagle.com/images/logo.png">
Leagle.com Leagle.com Leagle.com
Sign in
 

UTILITY SOLID WASTE ACTIVITIES GROUP v. E.P.A.

No. 15-1219 Consolidated with 15-1221 15-1222 15-1223 15-1227 15-1228 15-1229.

901 F.3d 414 (2018)

UTILITY SOLID WASTE ACTIVITIES GROUP, et al., Petitioners v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. Waterkeeper Alliance, et al., Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided August 21, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas H. Green and Paul J. Zidlicky argued the causes for Industry petitioners. With them on the joint briefs were John F. Cooney , Margaret K. Kuhn , Samuel B. Boxerman , Eric Murdock , Makram B. Jaber , Joshua R. More , Raghav Murali , Richard G. Stoll , Lori A. Rubin , and Thomas J. Grever.   Stephen J. Bonebrake , Brian H. Potts , and Aaron J. Wallisch entered appearances.

Thomas Cmar argued the cause for Environmental petitioners. With him on the briefs were Matthew E. Gerhart , Mary M. Whittle , and Lisa Evans.

Perry M. Rosen , Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the briefs were Jeffrey H. Wood , Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jonathan Skinner-Thompson , Attorney, and Laurel Celeste , Attorney, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Douglas H. Green , John F. Cooney , and Margaret K. Kuhn were on the brief for Industry intervenor-respondents.

Matthew E. Gerhart , Mary M. Whittle , and Lisa Evans were on the brief for Environmental intervenor-respondents.

Opinion filed Per Curiam.


These consolidated petitions challenge the Environmental Protection Agency's 2015 Final Rule governing the disposal of coal combustion residuals ("Coal Residuals") produced by electric utilities and independent power plants. See Hazardous and Solid Waste Management System; Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases

    DAVIDSON COUNTY v. HOOVER | 364 S.W.2d 879 (1963) | w2d87911228 | Leagle.com
     

    DAVIDSON COUNTY v. HOOVER


    364 S.W.2d 879 (1963)

    DAVIDSON COUNTY, Tennessee et al. v. J.H. HOOVER et ux.

    Supreme Court of Tennessee.

    February 7, 1963.


    Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

    Hooker, Hooker & Willis, Alfred H. Knight, III, William R. Willis, Jr., Nashville, for appellants.

    Shelton Luton, County Atty., Nashville, for appellees.


    BURNETT, Justice.

    The question presented by this lawsuit is whether or not a beauty parlor is permitted under the Nashville Zoning Ordinance in a Residential "B" District.

    After a complaint was made the County Zoning Inspector visited the premises of the Hoovers and found they were operating a beauty parlor in their home. The Hoovers at that time were notified that such an operation was not permitted. Applications were made and seasonably denied through various...

    Let's get started

    Leagle.com

    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
    Sign on now to see your case.
    Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

    • Updated daily.
    • Uncompromising quality.
    • Complete, Accurate, Current.

    Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

    Cited Cases

    • No Cases Found

    Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

    Citing Cases