CRESAP v. CHEMPLAST, INC.

No. 14155.

316 F.2d 920 (1963)

Charles N. CRESAP, Appellant, v. CHEMPLAST, INC.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Decided April 16, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Logan Cresap, New York City (William A. Fasolo, Hackensack, N. J., on the brief), for appellant.

Norman N. Popper, Newark, N. J. (Daniel H. Bobis, Union, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and FORMAN, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

The issue presented for our determination on this appeal is the validity of U.S. Patent No. 2,929,109. An examination of the record convinces us that the patent discloses nothing of patentable novelty. It seems, mechanical ingenuity aside, to contain nothing not adequately shown by the prior art. We conclude that it would not serve any useful purpose to review the evidence or the arguments of the parties here. Nothing can be added of consequence to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases