1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 221 F.Supp.
  5. 221 F.Supp. 980 (1963)
 

MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO. v. DITTO, INC.

No. 4-60 Civ. 60.

221 F.Supp. 980 (1963)

MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. DITTO, INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.

April 17, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. Abbott, St. Paul, Minn. (Edward A. Haight and John W. Hofeldt, Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for plaintiff.

James P. Hume and James M. Wetzel, of Byron, Hume, Groen & Clement, Chicago, Ill., and Paul J. McGough, Minneapolis, Minn., for defendant.

NORDBYE, District Judge.

The Court heretofore had determined as the result of the first hearing that the patent was invalid primarily by reason of the teachings of one Niepce as reflected in his article published in London in the Photographic News on June 3, 1859. Reference also was made in the Court's memorandum decision to the so-called Hunt article in the Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science of July-December, 1840. The Court filed its memorandum decision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases