MONROE AUTO EQUIP. CO. v. SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES, INC.

Civ. A. No. 1336-59.

220 F.Supp. 941 (1963)

MONROE AUTO EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division.

July 10, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lyon & Lyon, by Charles G. Lyon, Los Angeles, Cal., Harness, Dickey & Pierce, by Don K. Harness, Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff.

Fulwider, Patton, Rieber, Lee & Utecht, by Francis A. Utecht, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant.


Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment July 10, 1963.

CARR, District Judge.

This cause having come on for trial, the court having considered the evidence, the arguments, and the briefs, and being fully advised in the premises, it is the judgment of the court that plaintiff has failed to establish a case; that defendant is entitled to judgment; that both Patents No. 2,896,938 and No. 2,912,235 (hereinafter referred to as 938 and 235) are invalid...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases