1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 220 F.Supp.
  5. 220 F.Supp. 929 (1963)
 

FIELDCREST MILLS, INC. v. COURI

220 F.Supp. 929 (1963)

FIELDCREST MILLS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Basil J. COURI, George J. Couri and David E. Murad, Individually and as Co-partners Doing Business as Couri, Murad & Co., and Couristan, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

June 27, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Liddy, Sullivan, Hart, Daniels & Stemple, New York City, Joe E. Daniels, New York City, W. B. Lucas, Spray, N.C., and Sylvester J. Liddy, New York City, of counsel, for plaintiff.

Gallop, Climenko & Gould, New York City, George Trosk and Milton S. Gould, New York City, of counsel, for defendants.

COOPER, District Judge.

This is an action for trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C.A. § 1051 et seq., and for unfair competition in which the plaintiff seeks injunctive relief, an accounting and damages. Jurisdiction rests on 15 U.S.C.A. § 1121 and 28 U.S. C.A. § 1338(a).

THE MARK "KARASTAN"

Plaintiff, Fieldcrest Mills, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and its predecessors have been engaged in the manufacture and sale of domestic rugs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases